Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: 471 U.S. at 370-71. 2 In context however. the Court was simply distinguishing equitable reimburscment from damages. having stated the preceding sentence "[in this Court the Town repeatedly characterizes reimbursement AS 'damages. but that simply 15 not the case The Court was not setting limiting principie on the remedy was recognizing Furthermore taken to its logical conclusion Petitioner's inteipretation the Cour's explanation means that regardless of a school system default on Its obligations undci IDEA puard canot obtain reimbursement for the altemative exducational pogram she arranges unless the program rcplicates what the school system should have pror vided. This result correctly rejccted by the court below as well as by the Fifth Circuit untenable for many reasons parents tack the e ...
(.png)
